Top Tips Part I: Improving your Oral Argument

     This is the first in a series of Top Tip posts I’ll be making on litigation and presentation skills, culled from Pincus Professional Education CLE programs by judges, staff attorneys and practitioners, as well as the public speaking and oral argument courses I teach.

Improving your Oral Argument, Part I:

Presentation skills are critical to the success of any attorney. We need to be good at presenting in the board room, the court room, the office and even in the community, because that is what the job demands.

And, the better one is at public speaking, in any context, the more that person is perceived as an expert and a leader and the more that person advances in her or his career.

Below are five quick tips to improve your public speaking skills in the court room – but I could go on forever, and will provide more later on. These tips come straight from judges and court staff attorneys.  

  1. Find out who your audience is and meet their needs: in this case – the judge(s) or Justice(s)

Make sure your presentation is right for your audience – your trial or appellate judge.  Who is the judge and what is her or his (or their) approach on the bench? Should you expect a lot of questions, a quiet judge, a hot panel? Instead of approaching the argument from your perspective, approach it from theirs.

How do you do this?

•  ask around;

•  most importantly, take the time to go see your judge(s) / justice(s) in action, on multiple days;

•  think you don’t have time for a and b above?

You really do, you just have to give something else up – one less lunch, one less day at the gym, or a few less billable hours that month … whatever it is you have to give up, it is worth it to not be surprised the day of your argument.

And you will be amazed at how much you learn just by watching other attorneys do well, or not so well.

For a quick post on finding out more about your judge, regardless of where the court is located, see "Well, You’re Better Than You Look.” by Eileen Burkhalter Smith on the Young Lawyers Blog for more ideas on this topic.    

  1. Organize, Organize, Organize

One of the biggest problems attorneys have when presenting is being disorganized. That includes trying to cover too much. 

In an oral argument, you have time to cover, at most, 3 important issues. Pick your top three issues, and practice arguing them in any order possible.

For an excellent, detailed post on the how to organize, the judge's perspective, and what to expect, see Andrew Frey's article, "Preparing and Delivering Oral Argument" on Mayer Brown's Appellate Net site. 

  1. Don’t read your brief or your presentation.

First rule of oral argument: never read your brief. Assume the judge and her lawclerks have read it. 

Second rule, don’t write your presentation out word for word and read it. I know some of you love to do this, but it is a habit you have to learn to drop.  

Oral argument is your opportunity to have a conversation with your judge(s). 

It’s one of the most exciting, rewarding parts of litigating (really!). This is your chance to engage on an intellectual level with your judge and it’s their chance to get their questions answered (see #4 below) and learn what they need to learn to decide the case.

None of that happens if you read a presentation. On top of that, it really annoys judges.

I once heard a 20+ year career staff attorney for an appellate court describe oral argument this way:

“the most effective advocate imagines he or she is a law clerk in chambers explaining why a judge should go a certain way. They are not argumentative; instead, they focus on having a conversation about why judge should make the desired ruling.”
 

Many courts provide tips on their website and also post post oral arguments for you to learn from.  For example check out the Florida Supreme Court's information, "Information about Oral Arguments."

 

Continue Reading...

Motion to compel lunch granted: why opposing counsel should cooperate

I just found this great post by Vicky Pynchon,  at her www.negotiationlawblog.com blog on a judge who ordered counsel to have lunch (with thanks to Roger Wood, at Association Law Blog). 

The judge's tongue in cheek order shows a great sense of humor.  It also cleverly demonstrates just how ridiculous judges belive attorneys are when they behave like idiots.   

This one goes in my "it's about your credibility column."  The attorneys involved will never live this one down.

 

Is an attorney's credibility all the court is concerned about?

It's about your credibility...

Why start my first blog entry with this particular line, which borrows James Carville’s famous sound bite from Clinton’s first race (the first Clinton that is)?  Because it matters. 

This particular blog entry is aimed at litigators, but frankly the message applies to everyone, as is painfully and articulately made clear in Carolyn Elefant's post on trust and blogging.

Here’s the deal. I’ve talk to a lot of judges and justices over the last six years, as well as their staff attorneys, and I have listened to a few hundred of them speak. And if there is one over-riding theme, one predominant pattern, one universal truth they all seem to communicate, it’s this: it’s about your credibility.

Yep. “It’s about your credibility.”

Every time I sit through a CLE program or watch an oral argument, I promise myself I will write an article along these lines for some legal journal. And of course, I never do. So instead of a lengthy article, here’s my blog post.


What does it mean?

It means, for litigators at least, that when you practice law, when you are in the court room, when you write that brief, every time the court has any contact with you what-so-ever:  your actions affect your credibility, your credibility effects your reputation, and your reputation affects your success. 

If you have a good reputation, a clean reputation – i.e. you are credible, you aren’t known for misstating the facts or the case law, or for trying to pull a fast one on the court or your opponent – the court will generally cut you some slack if slack needs to be cut. 

The court will generally believe your case cites, instead of triple checking every single thing you write or say. 

The court will be more inclined to believe the reasons you have for needing an extension or changing a hearing date. 

In other words, the court will work with you.


Why does it matter?

Continue Reading...